Human rights

Woodside conducts business in a way that respects the human rights of all people, including our employees, the communities where we are active, and those working within our supply chains.

On this page
Overview
IMPORTANT TOPIC

Woodside conducts business in a way that respects the human rights of all people, including our employees, the communities where we are active, and those working within our supply chains

Our business conduct is informed by the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, which defines the accountabilities of governments in protecting human rights, and of business in respecting human rights.

Our approach

Our approach1

Our approach is informed by the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (Guiding Principles). The Guiding Principles define the accountabilities of governments in protecting human rights and of business in respecting human rights. Woodside’s commitment to human rights is set out in our Human Rights Policy and further detailed in Our Approach to Human Rights document, both available on our public website.

Collaboration enables Woodside to continue to learn and improve. For example, in Australia Woodside continues its involvement with the Human Rights Resource and Energy Collaborative which enables resource and energy companies to share learnings and develop best practice. The group provides a forum for sharing human rights experiences including in relation to supply chain issues and remedy. We also work with other organisations to further develop our human rights approach and understand emerging issues. Examples of these organisations include International Petroleum Industry Environmental Conservation Association, Business for Social Responsibility and Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPSHR). In addition, we also participate in the United Nations Annual Forum on Business and Human Rights.

We are continuing to strengthen our approach to human rights due diligence across our post-merger business to identify, prevent and mitigate potential adverse human rights impacts of our operations and business relationships. We use a number of tools such as:

  • Annual country risk assessments
  • Supplier self-assessment questionnaires
  • Additional vetting for suppliers based in high-risk locations and jurisdictions
  • Third party global risk screening tool
  • Marine vessel assurance, which includes human rights in relation to worker welfare
  • Social impact and opportunity assessments and human rights impact assessments

These tools form part of our human rights approach and enable us to understand our potential human rights risks to people. An update of our salience assessment for our post-merger global portfolio was conducted in 2023 with the support of an independent business and human rights expert. The update included a review of our identified potential human rights at risk of the most severe negative impact through the company’s activities and business relationships.

We continue to train our employees and contractors on human rights including their roles and responsibilities. In 2024, we held focussed awareness sessions for key areas of the business on our approach to human rights and continued to hold a one day sustainability course as part of our Navigator leadership program which included content on human rights and modern slavery.

Our performance

Our performance2

Our multi-disciplinary Human Rights Working Group met seven times during 2024. This working group reviews existing and potential human rights risks throughout the business or relevant to Woodside’s operations, whilst also sharing trends and lessons learnt.

Case studies

Case studies

Featured case study

Applying our human rights approach to solar opportunities

There have been a number of reports relating to modern slavery risks in the global solar photovoltaic supply chain. Due to the complexity of solar supply chains, there are several challenges to completing comprehensive due diligence of the full end to end supply chain, particularly the upstream supply of raw materials used in the manufacture of solar panels.
Case Study

Independent audit of fabrication yards

In 2022, we worked with one of our primary contractors for Pluto Train 2 to engage an independent auditor to conduct audits on two high-risk fabrication yards in Dubai, United Arab Emirates and Batam, Indonesia. In 2023, we received the report. Whilst modern slavery was not detected, the audit noted that management at the Dubai site retained the passports of foreign workers. Foreign workers, who were interviewed by the auditor separate to management, communicated that their passports were kept by management for safe keeping and that they were happy with this process. The contractor proactively addressed this audit finding by implementing a form for the worker to formally give their consent for their passports to be held (noting they would be returned whenever the employee requested). The contractor also provided a safe in each of the dormitories for those employees that preferred to keep their passports with them. This allowed the audit action to be closed out.

Footnotes

    Footnotes